

However, I don’t want to tie this issue to that specific platform, as others do exist. Every MSIX shell integration feature currently available is either implemented in some other way in that spec, or is simply impossible to implement correctly in a Windows app while staying fully portable. already has a detailed specification for how portable apps are to be integrated with the Windows platform. You could specifically mention it for UWP apps, win32 can already do it. Restore portable apps into installed appsĜouldĪuto-update portable appsĜould Important Notes With the focus of backwards compatibility in Reunion, will there be any issues running the same app in multiple versions of windows?Ĭonvert installed apps into portable apps ShouldĬreate portable copies of installed apps ShouldĬonvert portable apps into installed appsĜould May be similar standard can be implemented natively in MSIX.

They have a great list of available apps and a huge user base. There already is an open standard for portable apps by. Restore portable apps into installed apps RationaleĬonvert installed apps into portable appsĬonvert portable apps into installed apps

Similarly, you can install a browser as portable and take your extensions, bookmarks and history everywhere. VS Code offers a portable version in which you can choose to keep the extension data in the installed location and you can take those data to anywhere you want. This enables them to install the apps once on an external drive and use it across machines and user accounts and all the app data will be available in the installed location. Having portable apps is a huge request from users who hop on different machines regularly. Proposal: Support for portable installation of applications Summary
